Legal Opinion

State v. Burton

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 29, 1971No. 1 CA-CR 289, 1 CA-CR 290PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Judge.

Two criminal appeals involving identical issues and parties were consolidated for hearing in a pre-Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), setting. These appeals raised principally the question of the voluntariness of the appellant’s “plea-bargained” guilty plea to two charges: attempting to pass a forged personal money order and forgery of a Valley National Bank credit card. Since the mandate of Boykin is prospective from June 2, 1969, State v. Griswold, 105 Ariz. 1, 457 P.2d 331 (1969), appellant’s claim of error must be judged with reference to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. GriswoldArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. BustamanteArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. SchlarpCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API