State v. Brady
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
EUBANK, Judge.
On July 8, 1970, the defendant filed a “Motion For Leave to File Delayed Appeal” with our Supreme Court pursuant to its Rule 16(a), 17 A.R.S., alleging that neither the sentencing judge nor the court appointed counsel informed the defendant of his right to appeal from the judgment and sentence. The matter was transferred to this Court on January 8, 1971. After a response was filed by the Attorney General, our order was issued granting the defendant’s motion. The record fails to show such advice by the trial judge and defense counsel had no personal recollection of whether or not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. GriswoldArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Edward H. Hensley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- State v. JelksArizona Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LeyvasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Still v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- State of Arizona v. Nathan Andres LeyvasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009