Legal Opinion

State v. Brady

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 17, 1972No. 1 CA-CR 343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Judge.

On July 8, 1970, the defendant filed a “Motion For Leave to File Delayed Appeal” with our Supreme Court pursuant to its Rule 16(a), 17 A.R.S., alleging that neither the sentencing judge nor the court appointed counsel informed the defendant of his right to appeal from the judgment and sentence. The matter was transferred to this Court on January 8, 1971. After a response was filed by the Attorney General, our order was issued granting the defendant’s motion. The record fails to show such advice by the trial judge and defense counsel had no personal recollection of whether or not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. GriswoldArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Edward H. Hensley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  5. State v. JelksArizona Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LeyvasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Still v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State of Arizona v. Nathan Andres LeyvasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API