Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 10, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02605Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS J.S.S.,1 Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 18-2605-SAC COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On May 24, 2017, plaintiff filed an application for social security disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff alleged a disability onset date of April 19, 2017. The application was denied initially and on reconsideration. An administrative hearing was conducted on May 1, 2018. The administrative law judge (ALJ) considered the evidence and decided on June 4, 2018 that plaintiff was not qualified to receive…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Mary Hope CASIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API