Legal Opinion
Krummel v. Bombardier Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 27, 2000No. 98-30961PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:
Robert Krummel and his wife, Patricia Krummel, brought an admiralty and maritime claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(h) against Bombardier Corp. and Bombardier, Inc. (“Bombardier”) for damages resulting from Robert Krummel’s injuries while using a Bombardier personal watercraft.2 They alleged that the watercraft was unreasonably dangerous and Bombardier failed to warn them of these dangers. After a bench trial, the district court held that Bombardier did not defectively design the watercraft; however, Bombardier failed to provide warnings regarding use of the watercraft. The court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- John W. WHITTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, and New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Easton v. Chevron Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- McCarthy v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
- Bernard v. Ferrellgas, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Oswalt v. RESOLUTE INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Grenier v. Medical Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Stark v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Garcia v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.