Legal Opinion

Grenier v. Medical Engineering Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2001No. 00-30641PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from a products liability case involving silicone gel breast implants. In March 1983, Mary Grenier received breast implants manufactured by Medical Engineering Corporation (“MEC”). Eleven years later, Grenier sued MEC after learning that silicone gel had leaked or “bled” through the implant shell. The district court granted summary judgment for MEC. Grenier v. Medical Engineering Corp., 99 F.Supp.2d 759 (W.D.La.2000). The district court concluded that (1) the 1988 Louisiana Products Liability Act applied to Grenier’s claims; (2) Grenier could…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. RecoverEdge L.P. v. PentecostCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Lott v. HaleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Walls v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  5. Willett v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Amazing Spaces, Inc. v. Metro Mini StorageCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Terrebonne Parish School Board v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Durant v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API