Legal Opinion

State v. Testa

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 17, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SHEBELL, J.A.D.

This appeal raises anew the issue of the extent of disclosure required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, which directs that the condemning authority, prior to instituting an action to condemn, engage in bona fide negotiations with the property owner, including “an offer in writing ... setting forth ... the compensation offered to be paid and a reasonable disclosure of the manner in which the amount of such offered compensation has been calculated____” (Emphasis added). The State maintains that “N.J. S.A. 20:3-6 does not require disclosure during…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State, by Com'r of Transp. v. SirisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  2. STATE, BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. STATE, BY COMM'R OF TRANSPORTATION v. HancockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. STATE BY COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP. v. HancockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Morris County v. 8 Court Street Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tractenberg v. Township of West OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  2. STATE BY COMMISSIONER OF TRANSP. v. MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API