Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Curran

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 11, 1972No. 69 Civ. 442PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiffs, three members of the National Maritime Union of America (“NMU”), instituted this action in February, 1969, against defendants Curran and Wall, elected officers of the NMU, Perry, a former employee of NMU and Assistant to the President, and Segal, Freedman and Karchmer, Trustees of the NMU Officers Pension Plan (“the Pension Plan”). The complaint alleged that the Pension Plan had been amended in 1961 so as to include as participants designated employees of the NMU who were not elected officers of the NMU (“non-officers”), in violation of NMU’s constitution then in effect,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. National Maritime Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Wirtz v. National Maritime Union of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Morrissey v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Curran v. MorrisseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrissey v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API