Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Pleasanton

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 6, 1991No. C90-0122 DLJPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JENSEN, District Judge.

On May 8, 1991, this Court heard plaintiffs’ motions for summary adjudication of claims and involuntary dismissal of defen dant’s counterclaim, and defendant’s motion for summary adjudication of claim. Daniel C. Rooney appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Wayne and Judie Johnson, Dennis C. Beougher appeared on behalf of defendant City of Pleasanton. Having considered the papers submitted, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, the Court denies all summary judgment motions against the original movant, but grants such motions in favor of the nonmovant, and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Levinsky's, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Lowell and Malissa Edwards v. Mike Armstrong, Individually and as Mayor City of Louisa, Kentucky and the City Council of Louisa, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Abbott v. City of Cape CanaveralDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
  4. Levinsky's Inc. v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API