Legal Opinion

Pon Kwock Eng v. Klein

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 25, 2005No. 54217-6-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 It is the scope of a witness’s knowledge and not artificial classification by professional title that governs the threshold question of admissibility of expert medical testimony in a malpractice case. A practitioner of one school of medicine may testify regarding the practice in another school of medicine when the methods of treatment of the two are or should be the same. Because Dr. Vincent Quagliarello was knowledgeable as to the medical problem at issue, and the methods of treatment involved were not specialty-specific, we find he was qualified to testify. Therefore, summary judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. White v. Kent Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Fitzmaurice v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Seybold v. NeuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hill v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Hill v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Joshua Driggs v. Andrew T.G. Howlett, M.D., et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Winkler v. GiddingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Elber v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API