Legal Opinion

Sbarbaro v. Sbarbaro

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 22, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On bill for partition. On hearing on motion to strike out answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

In this suit complainant has filed a bill for partition of certain real estate, the title to which was acquired by complainant and defendant, .as tenants by the entirety. Since complainant and defendant thus acquired the property their marriage relation has been dissolved b3 decree of divorce a vinculo matrimomi.

Defendant, the former wife, has answered, setting up> as a bar to the partition suit the claim that a tenancy by the entirety cannot be partitioned.

A motion has been made b3 complainant against the answer by which motion it is sought to have this court determine whether…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alles v. LyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. In re the Appeal of LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kohn v. Hursa (In Re Hursa)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  2. Lawrence v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Mueller v. MuellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Interchange State Bank v. RiegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Townsend v. TownsendSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API