Terespolsky v. Law Offices of Stephanie K. Meilman, P.C.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.
The plaintiff, Sally Terespolsky, has brought a claim under G.L.c. 151B, §4 alleging that she was terminated by her employer because she was pregnant.1 The suit was brought against her employer, the Law Offices of Stephanie K. Meilman, P.C., and Stephanie K. Meilman individually.
This matter is now before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on the grounds that the Law Offices of Stephanie K. Meilman, P.C. was not an “employer” as that term is defined in chapter 151B. In connection with their motion,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Wright v. Shriners Hospital for Crippled ChildrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Harrison v. NetCentric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- C&I Steel, LLC v. Peabody Construction Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007