Legal Opinion

Elizabeth Haskell v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2012No. 10-15152PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Dissent by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER.

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Reginald Ento, Jeffrey Patrick Lyons, Jr., and Aakash Desai (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the enforcement of the 2004 Amendment, infra, to California’s DNA and Forensic Identification Data Base and Data Bank Act of 1998 (DNA Act), Cal.Penal Code § 296(a)(2)(C), which amendment requires law enforcement officers to collect DNA samples from all adults arrested…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. United States v. Earl DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Raynor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. Mario W. v. Hon. kaipio/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API