Legal Opinion

Hoult v. Rich

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1946No. 36,579PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.;

This was an action to quiet title to land. Plaintiffs prevailed and defendants have appealed.

The trial court found generally in favor of the plaintiffs, Charles H. Hoult and Louise K. Hoult, his wife. The defendants were Sam Rich, Bessie Rich and Max Woodburn, partners doing business as “Rich Sign Company.” The material facts, in substance, were:

Charles H. Hoult acquired title to a southwest quarter section of land in controversy by warranty deed from D. R. Lauck on January 31, 1944; the deed contained no reservations or exceptions; the land…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pope v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Gardom v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Faris v. FinnupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Penrose v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennerson v. SmallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Schwalm v. DeanhardtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. Lane v. CourangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Troutfetter v. BackmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Bennerson v. SmallDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API