Legal Opinion

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 27, 2001No. 00-730PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review for a second time whether the Court of Appeals was correct when it concluded that the Department of Transportation’s (DOT’s) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program is consistent with the constitutional guaranty of equal protection. But upon full briefing and oral argument we find that the current posture of this case prevents review of that important question. To address it would require a threshold inquiry into issues decided by the Court of Appeals but not presented in the petition for certiorari. We therefore dismiss the writ of cer-tiorari as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Glover v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. Steven GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API