Legal Opinion

Bracken v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1934No. Appeal 272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Bertha Bracken, widow of Harry C. Bracken, filed her claim for compensation against the Bethlehem Steel Co., his employer. The referee disallowed the claim but upon appeal was reversed by the compensation board with directions to make further investigation. After further testimony was taken, the referee awarded compensation which award was affirmed by the board and by the court of common pleas.

Harry C. Bracken was employed at defendant’s plant as a screen-man at a place where he worked alone. His duties as a screen-man were confined to operating levers of a coke chute at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Wiltbank v. Fire Assn. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Broad Street Trust Co. v. Heyl Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Jacobs v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Aurand v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API