Biomat, Inc. v. Sampson
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
BEIER, J.:
Defendant-appellant Biomat, Inc. (Biomat), seeks review of the district court’s partial denial of its motion to compel arbitration in this dispute over its Stock Redemption Agreement (Agreement) with plaintiffs-appellees Blaine and Margaret Sampson. We reverse, because we conclude that the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (1994), applies to the Sampsons’ claim that Biomat fraudulently induced them to enter into the Agreement.
Blaine Sampson worked for Biomat as its chief financial officer, and the Sampsons purchased 350,000 shares of Biomat stock. Biomat also issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lindsey v. Miami County National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- Appel v. Belmont Shore Investors CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hill v. Ricoh Americas Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009