Legal Opinion

Kirkman v. North State Bank of Amarillo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1972No. 8191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOY, Justice.

This is a suit upon the promissory note by plaintiff, North State Bank, with a writ of sequestration issuing on certain personal property of defendant, Jay U. Kirkman. Upon defendant’s filing of a motion to quash the writ, the plaintiff took a non-suit, On the day prior to the non-suit, plaintiff had filed another action in a different court on the identical note with another writ of sequestration issuing on the personal property. Defendant has here appealed on the non-suit cause.

Affirmed.

*959The parties are referred to here as they appear in this Court. Appellant’s first seven…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Blum v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Petersime Incubator Co. v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fair Deal Auto Sales v. Brantley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  2. First National Bank of Denver City v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API