Blum v. Gaines
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Burleson. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarlane. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by the appellee to recover damages, actual and exemplary, against the appellants, who were the makers of a sequestration bond in an action of trespass to try title to improved property claimed by the appellee as his homestead.
The suit in which a writ of sequestration was sued out and levied " was instituted by Leon & H. Blum December 11, 1878, and the other appellants were sureties upon the bond.
After the property was seized, the. appellee having failed to replevy it, it was replevied by Leon & H. Blum, who took possession *138of the same. That…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Sharp v. Schmidt & ZeiglerTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Bishop v. JaphetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Reavis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Vance v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.