Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Nextmarvel Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 18, 2024No. 8:23-cv-01918Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NIA CLEVELAND, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. TDC-23-1918 NEXTMARVEL, INC., d/b/a Vooglam, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Nia Cleveland has filed a putative class action against Defendant Next Marvel, Inc. d/b/a Vooglam (“Vooglam”), in which she alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”),

47 U.S.C. § 227

(2018). After Vooglam failed to appear or defend against the allegations, Cleveland filed a Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default, which was granted on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Ryan v. Homecomings Financial NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. LawbaughDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  4. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Nasser MoradiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API