State v. Miller
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
The defendant was tried and convicted on a charge of engaging in game farming without se curing a license as required by law. The action evidently being a test case, the defendant was fined ten dollars and costs, whereupon he entered his appeal.
The facts, substantially, are as follows: Appellant has been breeding foxes for a number of years and at .the time of trial had in Kitsap county thirty-six pairs of the animals, one-half being silver and the others blue foxes. The animals are raised for their pelts, and for sale for breeding purposes. Silver and blue foxes are a rare species of the fox…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State ex rel. Govan v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Barker v. State Fish CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Stimson Timber Co. v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Frach v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Baisden v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1929