Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1928No. 21401. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted on a charge of engaging in game farming without se curing a license as required by law. The action evidently being a test case, the defendant was fined ten dollars and costs, whereupon he entered his appeal.

The facts, substantially, are as follows: Appellant has been breeding foxes for a number of years and at .the time of trial had in Kitsap county thirty-six pairs of the animals, one-half being silver and the others blue foxes. The animals are raised for their pelts, and for sale for breeding purposes. Silver and blue foxes are a rare species of the fox…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. State ex rel. Govan v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Barker v. State Fish CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State Ex Rel. Stimson Timber Co. v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Frach v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Baisden v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API