Legal Opinion

Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap Lake

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2001No. 68520-7PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

The issue here is whether a “standby charge” imposed by the City of Soap Lake upon vacant, unimproved, uninhabited lots that abut but are unconnected to its water and sewer lines is a regulatory fee or a property tax. We find that the charge is a property tax and that, because it is not assessed uniformly according to the respective values of the properties within the class, it violates article VII, section 1 of the Washington Constitution. We therefore affirm.

*802FACTS

Over the past three decades, respondents Samis Land Company, The Samuel Israel Living Trust, and the Estate of Samuel Israel…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Arborwood Idaho v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Arborwood Idaho, L.L.C. v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API