Legal Opinion

People v. Galfund

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1968No. Crim. 15042PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Galfund and codefendants Usher and Cossairt were charged with possession of heroin (§ 11500, Health & Saf. Code). The cause was submitted on the transcript of the testimony taken at the preliminary hearing; the trial court found Galfund and Cossairt guilty as charged. Usher had a separate trial. Proceedings were suspended and Galfund was granted probation for three years and fined $300; only he appeals from the judgment. His purported appeal from the sentence and order denying motion for new trial is dismissed.

On the basis of information received by Officer Morgan, assigned to Narcotics…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MaupinOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Slettvet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. VeamatahauCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Howard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API