Legal Opinion

Obermier, Freidlander & Co. v. Core, Thompson & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1869PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court. Hon. John Whytock, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Obermier, Freidlander & Co. brought suit by attachment against William Wurtzburger, and the writ was levied on a stock of goods. Core, Thompson & Co. claimed the goods, and filed an interplea, setting up their title; to which issue was taken. The plaintiffs recovered judgment against the defendant, and the issue upon the interplea being submitted to the court, sitting as a jury, it found, as the facts proved, that the defendant, on the day preceding the levy of the attachment, transferred and delivered the goods in controversy to the plaintiffs, in part payment of a debt which he owed them,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CRAIG v. the State of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Hyde & Gleises v. Booraem & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1842

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buskirk Bros. v. PeckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. White v. Beal & Fletcher Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  3. Driggers v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Driggers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Gray v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API