Hyde & Gleises v. Booraem & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
IN error to the District Court of the United States for East Louisiana. - Booraem and Company, merchants of New York, agreed with Hyde and Gleises, merchants of New Orleans, who were indebted to them, to give them an extension of time for the payment of the amount due by them, if they would give their notes, payable at subsequent periods, for a certain sum, the notes to be endorsed, and deposited with H..
Read the full summary
IN error to the District Court of the United States for East Louisiana. - Booraem and Company, merchants of New York, agreed with Hyde and Gleises, merchants of New Orleans, who were indebted to them, to give them an extension of time for the payment of the amount due by them, if they would give their notes, payable at subsequent periods, for a certain sum, the notes to be endorsed, and deposited with H.. Locket, and to be delivered to them on their having paid certain engagements, due in New York; and the amount of which was included in the amount of the notes deposited in the hands of H.…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Story
This is the case of a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the eastern district of Louisiana. The original suit was brought conformably to‘the Louisiana practice by petition, in which Booraem and Company, the original petitioners, state, that two of the original defendants, Hyde and Gleises, merchants of New Orleans, being indebted to the petitioners in a considerable sum; did, in April, 1837, deliver to the petitioners certain promissory notes, to wit, three notes drawn by Hyde and Gleises to the order of, and endorsed by, T. R. Hyde and Brothers, dated the 6 th of April, 1837, at six,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parsons v. ArmorSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dower v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Local No. 234 of United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Jeffries v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Prentice v. Zane's Administrator.Supreme Court of the United States · 1850
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.