In Re Support of Burks
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE RIZZI
delivered the opinion of the court:
Petitioner, James Burks, filed a petition to modify his support obligation to respondent, Mary Paxton Burks, and their children. This obligation arose from a settlement agreement between respondent and petitioner which was incorporated in a divorce judgment. The trial court refused to grant the relief sought in the petition. Petitioner appeals, contending that the trial court’s ruling was erroneous and that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to respondent’s attorney. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
A…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lamp v. LampIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Glass v. PeitchelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Lamp v. LampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Dull v. DullAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Scott v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SchulsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Trossman v. PhilipsbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- In Re Marriage of MacAlusoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.