Legal Opinion

In Re Support of Burks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1981No. 80-414, 80-1023 consPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE RIZZI

delivered the opinion of the court:

Petitioner, James Burks, filed a petition to modify his support obligation to respondent, Mary Paxton Burks, and their children. This obligation arose from a settlement agreement between respondent and petitioner which was incorporated in a divorce judgment. The trial court refused to grant the relief sought in the petition. Petitioner appeals, contending that the trial court’s ruling was erroneous and that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to respondent’s attorney. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

A…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lamp v. LampIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Glass v. PeitchelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Lamp v. LampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Dull v. DullAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Scott v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SchulsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Trossman v. PhilipsbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. In Re Marriage of MacAlusoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API