Legal Opinion

Katz v. North Kansas City Development Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $5500 and defendant has appealed. This is the second appeal in the case. [See Katz v. North Kansas City Devl. Co., 258 S. W. 752.]

Additional facts were proved by plaintiff at the latter trial. A.t this trial plaintiff put upon the stand none of the witnesses who testified for her in the former trial but the testimony of her witnesses taken at the former trial was introduced in evidence by the defendant. At this trial plaintiff introduced the depositions of witnesses Fleck and Murphy…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  2. Davidson v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Proctor v. Hann. & St. Joe. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. White v. MaxcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Davidson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Senseney v. Landay Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. American Veterinary Laboratories v. Campbell Paint & Varnish Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Benton v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API