Legal Opinion
State v. Brooke
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 2000No. 25616PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this appeal Steve W. Brooke contends that his guilty plea to a felony should be set aside because the prosecutor breached the plea agreement. Additionally, Brooke argues that his sentence is excessive.
BACKGROUND
Brooke was charged with sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1506, based on allegations that he fondled the breasts of his thirteen-year-old stepdaughter. Brooke subsequently entered into a plea agreement with the State by which he agreed to plead guilty to the amended charge of battery with intent to commit a serious felony, I.C. §§…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ford v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FuhrimanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. JonesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. GAMINOIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.