Legal Opinion

Nathalie Norris v. Arizona Governing Committee For Tax Deferred Annuity And Deferred Compensation Plans

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1986No. 85-1640Published

1Opinion of the Court

796 F.2d 1119

41 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 820,

40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,371, 55 USLW 2132,

7 Employee Benefits Ca 1913

Nathalie NORRIS, on behalf of herself and all others

similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ARIZONA GOVERNING COMMITTEE FOR TAX DEFERRED ANNUITY AND

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS, STATE OF ARIZONA, et

al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-1640.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 10, 1986.

Decided Aug. 11, 1986.

Amy J. Gittler, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Barry A. McNaughton, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API