Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 29, 1995No. 1 CA-CR 94-0794 PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

Tony Sylvester Rodriguez (defendant) petitions for review of the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief under Rule 32 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. We hold that a defendant who seeks Rule 32 relief following his conviction at trial is entitled to file a pro se petition if the trial court is informed that appointed counsel has no intention of doing so.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A jury convicted defendant of aggravated driving while under the influence and aggravated driving with an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or more, both class 5 felonies.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Montgomery v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Greenway v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Scott v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. State v. JacottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API