Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Ashley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1939No. Civ. 2329PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondents. The motion is made on the grounds (1) that the question to be decided is moot, and (2) that mandamus is not the proper remedy in this proceeding to determine necessary qualifications for office.

On March 14, 1939, petitioner filed his petition with the county clerk of San Diego County asking for a writ of mandate requiring respondent John M. Ashley, as city clerk of the city of San Diego, to refrain from putting the name of the Honorable Clarence F. Terry, a candidate for municipal judge to succeed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Wood v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. KnoblockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Cohen v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watson v. Los Altos School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Department of Mental Hygiene v. RosseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Roscoe v. GoodaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Murchie v. BathIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API