Legal Opinion
At & T Communications of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 15, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
Where the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission initially orders that an ad hoc committee resolve conflicting interpretations under 52 Pa.Code § 64.22(2)'for a local telephone exchange carrier’s role in interexchange customer billing inquiries, and, by later action, rejects the committee’s interpretation and recommended proposal, is the initial order (in 1988) interlocutory, and thus not a final, appeal-able order as of right because that order did not put the aggrieved parties “out of court?”
Also, does Title I of the federal Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 153(a) (Act),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sweener v. First Baptist Church of EmporiumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sofronski v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Direnzo Coal Co. v. Department of General Services, Bureau of PurchasesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Energy Pipeline Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Crossgates Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Public Grounds & BuildingsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.