Burton v. Southern Ice Company, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff did not file a claim or request a hearing, in those terms, within the two year period following the injury, as required by statute. N.C.G.S. § 97-24(a). Before the Full Commission, plaintiff argues that his hearing counsel complied with this statute by sending copies of correspondence with plaintiff's physicians and the defendant-carrier's adjustor to the Commission. The Court of Appeals has held that, "There are circumstances where an informal letter may serve as the filing of a claim for compensation."
One such instance occurred in the case of Cross v. Fieldcrest v. Mills, 19 N.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Wilson v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.