Legal Opinion

Burton v. Southern Ice Company, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided June 1, 1995No. I.C. No. 129698Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff did not file a claim or request a hearing, in those terms, within the two year period following the injury, as required by statute. N.C.G.S. § 97-24(a). Before the Full Commission, plaintiff argues that his hearing counsel complied with this statute by sending copies of correspondence with plaintiff's physicians and the defendant-carrier's adjustor to the Commission. The Court of Appeals has held that, "There are circumstances where an informal letter may serve as the filing of a claim for compensation."

One such instance occurred in the case of Cross v. Fieldcrest v. Mills, 19 N.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Wilson v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API