Legal Opinion

Brostoff v. Berkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a judgment vacating an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered on May 23, 1990, summarily holding petitioner in contempt of court, is denied, the cross-motion granted and the proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An examination of the transcript of the underlying proceedings demonstrates that respondent was clearly justified in summarily finding petitioner, an assistant district attorney, in criminal contempt of court. Indeed, petitioner acknowledges that his conduct was regrettable and that he should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katz v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Balter v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Rogers & WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. EaddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Pozefsky v. JungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Levine v. RecantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Porter v. SaarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API