Legal Opinion

Balter v. Regan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1984PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*631Petitioner, an Assistant Public Defender, was ordered by a City Court Judge to proceed to trial representing a criminal defendant, in spite of the fact that petitioner’s office was also representing the People’s primary witness in an unrelated criminal proceeding. Both petitioner and the People were further directed not to question the witness on the criminal charge or the plea agreement he had reached. Petitioner refused to proceed, believing that to do so would involve an ethical violation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rivera v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Bickwid v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Zafran v. ZafranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Brostoff v. BerkmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API