Legal Opinion

State v. Wyrick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1978No. 7718SC752PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

Defendant first contends the trial court erred in allowing Detective G. D. Payne of the Greensboro Police Department to testify, over defendant’s objections, for the purpose of corroborating the State’s witnesses, Frank Campbell and Broughton Sutton. This contention is without merit, as the defendant cross-examined both witnesses and offered evidence contradicting their testimony.

The controlling rule of law is set forth in State v. Carter, 293 N.C. 532, 535, 238 S.E. 2d 493, 495 (1977), as follows:

In this jurisdiction, evidence tending to support a witness’s credibility is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. . LunsfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API