Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Bent

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1924PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The only valid reason of appeal by the defendant is that the court erred in setting aside the directed verdicts for the defendant. The second and third reasons of appeal, which question the validity of the reasons given by the court for setting the verdicts aside, are of no avail. Error cannot be predicated on an expression of opinion contained in a memorandum of decision as to the facts or the law of the cause, unless such memorandum be made a part of the finding on appeal.

The defendant’s claim is that the evidence shows that the occupants of the defendant’s automobile were returning from a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Wentworth v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Grubb v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bloom v. Leech, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Weller v. Fish Transport Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API