Wilson v. Remmel Cattle Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
Judgment non obstante veredicto was improperly rendered after a jury trial because a viable disputed fact issue was not submitted to the jury and is yet unresolved. Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Appellants Gary Wilson and Ben Wilson bought 118 head of cattle with the proceeds of their $29,393.91 bank note. On 8 October 1973, the cattle were delivered to and placed in a separate pen on the premises of appellee Remmel Cattle Co., Inc., a commercial feedlot engaged in feeding and marketing cattle, pursuant to an agreement between the Wilsons and appellee Charles Kent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Rodriguez v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Wade v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Holly Sugar Company of Hereford v. AguirreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. LowTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Tucker, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Dittberner v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- First State Bank, Morton v. ChesshirCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Larrumbide v. Doctors Health Facilities, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.