Legal Opinion
Dittberner v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 7, 1977No. 8821PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
The trial court rendered judgment for the payee-holder of a promissory note against a co-maker, adjudging that the co-maker take nothing in his actions based on fraud, either for recovery of monetary damages or in defense of liability on the note, or for judgment over against the other co-maker. On the appellate record, the co-maker waived a finding on an essential element of fraud that was not established as a matter of law, but no challenge has been made to his plea for judgment over against the other comaker. Reformed and affirmed.
C. H. Bell contracted to sell his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- City of Dallas v. Moreau, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Austin State Hospital v. Kitchen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Siderius, Inc. v. Wallace Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Olin Corp. v. Cargo Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- State v. HuffstutlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.