Legal Opinion

People v. ALSTER

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 12, 2009No. 07PDJ056Published

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT, DECISION, AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c)

I. ISSUE

Respondent placed personal funds into a COLTAF account and thereafter used it as a personal business account to hide personal assets from his creditors. He also failed to provide mitigating evidence or otherwise participate in these proceedings. When an attorney violates a duty owed as a professional and then engages in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, the presumptive sanction ranges from public censure to suspension. What is the appropriate sanction for Respondent's…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OverboeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against ThibodeauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API