Collier v. Hanna
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
A re-argument was ordered in this case at the instance of one of the Judges, who concurred in the disposition heretofore made of it, and upon this re-argument, which has been very able, we are all of opinion that we must adhere to the conclusions we reached on the original hearing.
Shortly stated, the facts are these: John E. Clark and George U. Eorster were partners in the wholesale liquor business, under the firm name of “Forster, Clai'k & Co.,” and on the 14th of December, 1887, they executed an agreement to dissolve the partnership, and a notice of dissolution for publication in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gable v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Luckemeyer v. SeltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Strauss v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palmer v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Lang v. ShanawolfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Stockslager v. Mechanics' Loan & Savings InstituteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Slingluff v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Henderson, Pfeil & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.