Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Henderson, Pfeil & Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeals from pro forma orders- of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, quashing writs of attachment laid in the hands of the assignee for the benefit of creditors of the firm of Henderson, Pfeil & Co.
1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.
These four cases come up from a pro forma order quashing attachments sued out by the appellants against the appellees, Henderson, Pfeil and Company. In November, eighteen hundred and ninety-two, John B. Henderson, George Henry Pfeil and Alexander J. McDonald formed a copartnership which carried on business in Baltimore City until October the fourth, eighteen hundred and ninety-five. On that day the copaitnership was dissolved. It was indebted at the time to sundry persons, but whether it was insolvent or not is one of the controverted issues of fact that will be considered later on. Henderson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huiskamp v. Moline Wagon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Phelps v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Darby & Co. v. GilliganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Peyser v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Thayer v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957