Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Rose

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 2003Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McEWEN, P.J.E.,

Concurring and Dissenting:

¶ 1 Since the author of the majority Opinion has provided a sound rationale of position and a perceptive expression of view, I hasten to join in that portion of the Opinion that holds that the charges withdrawn at the district justice level were properly reinstated in response to the appeal filed by appellant. I am, however, unable to agree that appellant could collaterally attack the validity of the Florida license suspension in this prosecution for violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1606. Cf. Commonwealth v. Wolf, 534 Pa. 283, 632 A.2d 864 (1993); Fetty v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. O'Hara v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor VehiclesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Fetty v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API