Legal Opinion

Hess v. New York Press Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by Charles A. Hess against the New York Press Company, Limited. From an order striking out portions of amended answer, •defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The action is for libel, consisting in the publication of a series of articles concerning the plaintiff in the fall of 1896, while he was a Republican candidate for member of congress. -Some of the charges were specific in character; others, general. It is insisted that the portions of the answer stricken out were pleaded in mitigation of damages with respect to the general charges made, ■and were directed to showing that the defendant acted in good faith, without malice, in the belief that its assertions concerning the plaintiff were true, and that such assertions were made with probable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knickerbocker Co. v. RoskopfNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sharon v. Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API