Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Valley of the Sun Recovery & Adjustment Bureau, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 13, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4170PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OGG, Chief Judge.

This is a negligence action based on a shooting that occurred during an attempted repossession of an automobile. The appellant-plaintiff, Norman Griffith, an innocent bystander, was injured by the accidental discharge.

In their complaint, Norman and Hanne-lore Griffith alleged that the appellees, a collection and repossession agency, its owners, and its employee, Donald Gorney, had attempted to repossess an automobile in such a careless and reckless fashion as to have precipitated the shooting. The appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment was granted and this appeal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morris v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Northern Lights Motel, Inc. v. SweaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. CornumArizona Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. MBank El Paso, N.A. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rand v. Porsche Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Hutto v. FranciscoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Abeita v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Davis v. MangelsdorfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API