F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.

When this case was first under consideration, I thought that the judgment should be affirmed as to Milcor, reversed as to Blackburn, and, in a memorandum to my brethren,1 said so. Whether the shrill and •strident clamancy of appellant’s frictional approach, calculated with its charges of fraud and perjury to generate more heat than light, was the stone of stumbling to me, or whether that master darkener of •counsel, my brother from Connecticut, with his firm footed statement of New York law, turned my feeble light to darkness, I cannot say. I only know that I turned aside from the sole and…