Commonwealth v. Charles Joseph Talbert
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
In this appeal, taken pursuant to Code § 19.2-398, the Commonwealth contends that the trial court erred when it suppressed evidence based upon its finding (1) that the police officers were not in hot pursuit of the defendant when they followed him into a residence, and (2) that no exigent circumstances necessitated the officers’ entry into the residence. We agree and reverse the order of suppression.
Talbert contends that the Commonwealth is barred from raising on appeal the issue whether the evidence established exigent circumstances necessitating the officers’ entry into the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RicciSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Jacob Coles Small v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- State v. LamontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LamontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001