Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lamont

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2001No. NonePublished

1DissentAmundson, Justice

[¶ 48.] I dissent on issues 2 and 3 for the forgoing reasons.

Issue 2. Warrantless Entry into Lamont’s Dwelling3

[¶ 49.] A. Search incident to lawful arrest

[¶ 50.] The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article VI, § 11 of the South Dakota Constitution provide that people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It has long been established that the Fourth Amendment prohibits police from entering into a suspect’s home to make a felony arrest. Payton, supra, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API