Legal Opinion
Kunz v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtWilmot M. Smith, J.
The plaintiff, who is a property-owner on the comer of Adams and Prospect streets, seeks to enjoin the defendant — First, from constructing a curve.at the corner nearest his property, to connect the tracks of- the Nassau Electric Railroad Company on Adams street with the tracks of the Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad on Prospect street; second, from operating cars over the tracks of the Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad Company and the Nassau Electric Railroad Company and the proposed curve which is to conne'ct them. The curve is to be erected by the defendant -under a contract with the other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People v. Brooklyn, Flatbush & Coney Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Buffalo, Bellevue & Lancaster Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Ingersoll v. Nassau Electric Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gallagher v. KeatingNew York Supreme Court · 1899