Legal Opinion

Tonopah Banking Corp. v. McKane Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1909No. 1787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Nye County; J. P. O’Brien, Judge. Action by the Tonopah Banking Corporation against the McKane Mining Company of Tonopah, Nevada. From an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate an execution sale, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sweeney, J.:

On the 2d day of November, 1907, the plaintiff commenced suit against the defendant for the recovery of the sum of $9,667.22, and interest, alleged to have been loaned to the defendant, together with costs of suit and $1,000 attorney’s fees. A demurrer was interposed by the defendant upon several grounds, and the plaintiff thereafter, by leave of court, amended its complaint to meet the objections interposed by the demurrer. On the 23d day of December, 1907, a stipulation was entered into between counsel for the opposing parties, wherein it was agreed that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Denny v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Goodbar, White & Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Bullard v. McArdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Morrell v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  5. Boos v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oregon Mortgage Co., Ltd. v. KunnekeMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Beck v. CurtiNevada Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Boller v. Sun Valley Shamrock Resources, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API