Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Ochiltree Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1940No. Appeal, 257PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kelleb, P. J.,

This appeal grows out of the accident which was considered by us in the workmen’s compensation case of Kelly v. Ochiltree Electric Co. et al., 125 Pa. Superior Ct. 161, 190 A. 166, and is specially concerned with the subrogation provisions in favor of the employer contained in section 319 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as respects any right of action of the injured employee, or of his dependents in case of his death, against a third person liable for the injury or death. The section is given in the margin.

Cameron W. Kelly, an employee of Ochiltree Electric Company,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Rosenzweig v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Escambia County Electric Light & Power Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Smith v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Hamilton v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Greenville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. FRAZIER v. Oil Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Bennett v. AndreeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Daniels v. KroegerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API